No need for 'double punishment' in mandatory sentence case, Supreme Court rules

By
1 Min Read
- Advertisement -
Ad image

A woman who was barred from driving for almost two years while awaiting sentencing would face “a kind of double punishment” if she were now handed an additional mandatory one-year prohibition, Canada’s top court has ruled.

The unanimous Supreme Court of Canada decision affirmed the common law convention that a court may grant credit for time already served when there is no explicit provision against doing so.

The ruling came Friday in the case of Jennifer Basque, who was charged with operating a motor vehicle with excess blood alcohol concentration in Moncton, N.B., in 2017.

Basque spent the next 21 months, between her initial

- Advertisement -
Share This Article
Follow:
WNews is a digital and print newsroom committed to investigative, balanced, and honest journalism. Our team covers breaking news, politics, global affairs, community stories, and in-depth investigations across Canada, the United States, and around the world. From frontline reporting to long-form analysis, WNews delivers coverage that prioritizes truth, accuracy, and transparency. Our mission is simple: bring news back to news and restore trust in a time when it matters most. Follow our latest reports at W.News and across all WNews platforms.
- Advertisement -
Ad image
Leave a Comment
Report a Error with this Story

Notice a error or facts with this story, please submit the information below and someone from our newsroom will review it and change if required 

Reading: No need for 'double punishment' in mandatory sentence case, Supreme Court rules

(C) 2012 – 2024  | WNews Broadcasting Corp, a W-World Company | All Rights Reserved

Connect
with Us